All posts by joewallin@outlook.com

FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Reporting Drama is Over

From FinCEN:

“Immediate Release

February 27, 2025

WASHINGTON––Today, FinCEN announced that it will not issue any fines or penalties or take any other enforcement actions against any companies based on any failure to file or update beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act by the current deadlines. No fines or penalties will be issued, and no enforcement actions will be taken, until a forthcoming interim final rule becomes effective and the new relevant due dates in the interim final rule have passed. This announcement continues Treasury’s commitment to reducing regulatory burden on businesses, as well as prioritizing under the Corporate Transparency Act reporting of BOI for those entities that pose the most significant law enforcement and national security risks.

No later than March 21, 2025, FinCEN intends to issue an interim final rule that extends BOI reporting deadlines, recognizing the need to provide new guidance and clarity as quickly as possible, while ensuring that BOI that is highly useful to important national security, intelligence, and law enforcement activities is reported.

FinCEN also intends to solicit public comment on potential revisions to existing BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN will consider those comments as part of a notice of proposed rulemaking anticipated to be issued later this year to minimize burden on small businesses while ensuring that BOI is highly useful to important national security, intelligence, and law enforcement activities, as well to determine what, if any, modifications to the deadlines referenced here should be considered.”

Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Resumes: Key Updates for Businesses

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) reporting regime is back on as of February 20, 2025. The CTA is a U.S. law that requires certain companies to report their beneficial ownership information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to enhance transparency and combat financial crimes like money laundering. While the enforcement of the CTA faced legal challenges, including a nationwide preliminary injunction in December 2024 that temporarily halted it, the most recent development has reinstated the reporting requirements.

Specifically, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted a stay on the previous injunction, making the CTA’s reporting obligations mandatory once again. Here’s what this means for businesses:

  • Who Must Comply: Most small and medium-sized businesses formed as corporations, LLCs, or similar entities are required to file Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reports with FinCEN.
  • Deadlines:
  • Companies formed before January 1, 2024, must submit their initial BOI reports by March 21, 2025.
  • Companies formed on or after January 1, 2024, have 90 days from their creation date to file.
  • Penalties: Failure to comply with these reporting requirements could lead to civil or criminal penalties.

Businesses should take immediate steps to understand their obligations under the CTA, as the reporting regime is now active. However, it’s worth noting that ongoing legal challenges could potentially affect its status in the future, so staying updated on any new developments is advisable. For now, the CTA reporting requirements are in full effect.

The CTA Deadline Is Looming

https://share.synthesia.io/embeds/videos/fc70ac97-b26e-447b-8ffd-ab735106824b

CTA Beneficial Ownership Information Filing 

  1. We are writing to inform you about a new legal requirement that you will need to either comply with or confirm that your company is exempt from before the end of this year
  1. The Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) is a new law that will require almost all small businesses in the US to: 
  1. file information with the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) database (https://boiefiling.fincen.gov/); and  
  1. update that database within 30 days if any of the information changes. 
  1. There are 23 exemptions (https://www.fincen.gov/boi-faqs#C_2), including a “large operating company” exemption for companies that (i) own or lease a US office, (ii) have more than 20 full-time employees, and (iii) more than $5M in revenue. 
  1. If your company is not exempt and your company was formed before the start of this calendar year 2024, then you must file beneficial ownership information with the FinCEN database no later than January 1, 2025.  
  1. If your company is not exempt and your company formed during 2024, then you must file beneficial ownership information with the FinCEN database no later than 90 days after the company’s date of formation.  
  1. There are civil and criminal penalties for failure to comply. 
  1. The information that a company will have to provide to FinCEN includes certain company information and information about the company’s “beneficial owners.” 
  1. Beneficial owners include 25% or greater owners, senior officers, directors, and other individuals who can direct or control significant decisions for the company. 
  1. Companies that are not exempt will need to collect the following information from beneficial owners to file with FinCEN, either (i) the beneficial owner’s FinCEN number (if they have applied for and obtained one) or (ii) full legal name, date of birth, residence address, non-expired passport or state identification number, and copy of such document
  1. If any beneficial ownership information or any other information changes, companies will only have 30 days to update the FinCEN database. If beneficial owners provide companies with their FinCEN numbers, companies will file that number with their report, and it will be the responsibility of each beneficial owner to keep their information up to date. 
  1. Confirming continuing compliance with the continuous database update requirement will require companies to put policies and procedures in place to assure continued compliance. 

If you have any questions about this, we have a group of lawyers who have spent a considerable amount of time educating themselves about the rules so we can answer them promptly. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us. 

IP Assignments & Confidentiality Agreements

My colleague Susan Schalla and I put together the below video chat on IP assignments and confidentiality agreements for Founders Live. If you haven’t checked out Founders Live, check it out at https://founderslive.mn.co/.

Carney Badley Spellman is about Advocacy, Strategy, Results. Located in Seattle, we are a full-service law firm committed to exceptional client service and professional excellence. Our firm serves individuals, professionals, entrepreneurs, educators, closely-held or family businesses, franchises, Fortune 500 corporations, and insurance companies.  They are in the private sector, public sector, and governments.  Our clients are forward thinkers, creative, collaborative, and deliver high-quality products and business services to their markets.  Their markets extend into almost every industry including, food and beverage, retail, professional services, arts, health care, education, manufacturing, technology, construction, real estate, and more.  We advocate for our clients.  We strategize with them to meet their goals.

By Joe Wallin & Susan Schalla

For more related articles about IP Assignments & Confidentiality Agreements, please visit our website, here

SEC Guidance on Crypto

If you are interested in how the SEC is thinking about crypto tokens as securities, we recommend you watch William Hinman’s recent speech and read its transcript. We’ve included an embed and a link to the speech below.

We think perhaps the most important and interesting part was this:

But this also points the way to when a digital asset transaction may no longer represent a security offering. If the network on which the token or coin is to function is sufficiently decentralized – where purchasers would no longer reasonably expect a person or group to carry out essential managerial or entrepreneurial efforts – the assets may not represent an investment contract. Moreover, when the efforts of the third party are no longer a key factor for determining the enterprise’s success, material information asymmetries recede. As a network becomes truly decentralized, the ability to identify an issuer or promoter to make the requisite disclosures becomes difficult, and less meaningful.

https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-hinman-061418

 

For more related articles on topics such as crypto, please visit our website here.

Carney Badley Spellman is about Advocacy, Strategy, Results. Located in Seattle, we are a full-service law firm committed to exceptional client service and professional excellence. Our firm serves individuals, professionals, entrepreneurs, educators, closely-held or family businesses, franchises, Fortune 500 corporations, and insurance companies.  They are in the private sector, public sector, and governments.  Our clients are forward thinkers, creative, collaborative, and deliver high-quality products and business services to their markets.  Their markets extend into almost every industry including, food and beverage, retail, professional services, arts, health care, education, manufacturing, technology, construction, real estate, and more.  We advocate for our clients.  We strategize with them to meet their goals.

Equity Crowdfunding Video Chat

My colleague Danny Neuman and I put together this video about equity crowdfunding for an AMA on Nick Hughes’ Founders Live group.

Equity crowdfunding can proceed along a number of different pathways, including:

  • Rule 506(c)
  • Title III
  • State equity crowdfunding laws
  • Regulation A+

If you want to raise money through an equity crowdfunding, we would be happy to talk to you about the various pathways, the amounts you can raise under each approach, the various complications and expected costs of each approach.

Carney Badley Spellman is about Advocacy, Strategy, Results. Located in Seattle, we are a full-service law firm committed to exceptional client service and professional excellence. Our firm serves individuals, professionals, entrepreneurs, educators, closely-held or family businesses, franchises, Fortune 500 corporations, and insurance companies.  They are in the private sector, public sector, and governments.  Our clients are forward thinkers, creative, collaborative, and deliver high-quality products and business services to their markets.  Their markets extend into almost every industry including, food and beverage, retail, professional services, arts, health care, education, manufacturing, technology, construction, real estate, and more.  We advocate for our clients.  We strategize with them to meet their goals.

 

For more related articles or videos, about topics such as equity crowdfunding, please visit our website, here.

Taxation of Stock Options: Senate Bill Update

Taxation of Stock Options

As of now, the Senate has abandoned the idea of taxing stock options as they vest.

This is the modification to the mark, released late yesterday.

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/11.14.17%20Chairman’s%20Modified%20Mark.pdfhttps://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/11.14.17%20Chairman’s%20Modified%20Mark.pdf

The modification strikes the proposal–Item III.H.1, Nonqualified deferred compensation–from the Chairman’s Mark.  A new discussion of Treatment of Qualified Equity Grants begins on p. 69.

The new proposal includes does a complete u-turn from what was originally proposed.

By Joe Wallin – The Startup Law Blog

Carney Badley Spellman is about Advocacy, Strategy, Results. Located in Seattle, we are a full-service law firm committed to exceptional client service and professional excellence. Our firm serves individuals, professionals, entrepreneurs, educators, closely-held or family businesses, franchises, Fortune 500 corporations, and insurance companies.  They are in the private sector, public sector, and governments.  Our clients are forward thinkers, creative, collaborative, and deliver high-quality products and business services to their markets.  Their markets extend into almost every industry including, food and beverage, retail, professional services, arts, health care, education, manufacturing, technology, construction, real estate, and more.  We advocate for our clients.  We strategize with them to meet their goals.

For more related articles or videos, about topics such as Taxation of Stock Options, please visit our website, here.

Stock Option Taxation: The Senate’s Tax Bill

Stock option taxation is a sensitive issue in startup land. Fred Wilson recently sounded the alarm about the Senate’s proposal to tax stock options as they vest. TechCrunch has also written about this.

Right now, what we have to work with is the DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN’S MARK OF THE “TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT”.

The document lays out the proposal as follows:

Under the proposal, any compensation deferred under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan is includible in the gross income of the service provider when there is no substantial risk of forfeiture of the service provider’s rights to such compensation. For this purpose, the rights of a service provider to compensation are treated as subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture only if the rights are conditioned on the future performance of substantial services by any individual. Under the proposal, a condition related to a purpose of the compensation other than the future performance of substantial services (such as a condition based on achieving a specified performance goal or a condition intended in whole or in part to defer taxation) does not create a substantial risk of forfeiture, regardless of whether the possibility of forfeiture is substantial. In addition, a covenant not to compete does not create a substantial risk of forfeiture.

What is interesting about this is it runs completely counter to how the world works today. Today, if you grant stock options at fair market value, there is no tax to the optionee upon receipt. Nor is there tax on vesting. But the new rule proposes taxing on vesting. This is distressing.

Incentive Stock Options Carved Out

There is some good news here. Apparently “statutory options” would not trigger this new rule. See below. Only nonqualified stock options would be problematic.

The proposal applies to all stock options and SARs (and similar arrangements involving noncorporate entities), regardless of how the exercise price compares to the value of the related stock on the date the option or SAR is granted. It is intended that no exceptions are to be provided in regulations or other administrative guidance. However, it is intended that statutory options are not considered nonqualified deferred compensation for purposes of the proposal.

It will be interesting to see what happens here.

A Better Idea

My proposal would be: Congress should make it easier for companies to share equity with workers. I don’t believe service providers should be taxed at all when they receive stock in a private company. The stock can’t be sold, and generally must be held indefinitely.

If the Congress passed a sensible law, which said that service providers would not be taxed on the receipt of equity of their employer if not a registered security that was freely tradeable, equity sharing would flourish, and the wealth created by startup companies would be more widely shared. This would be good for our economy and our politics.

Founder Tax Issues

In this video, we talk about founder tax issues, primarily:

  1. The 83(b) election — when it applies; when it doesn’t; when it is due; etc.
  2. Qualified Small Business Stock considerations in choosing what type of business entity to form.

We hope you enjoy the video.

My colleague Susan Schalla and I have been making videos for Nick Hughes’ Founders Live Group, followed by AMA chat sessions.

Carney Badley Spellman is about Advocacy, Strategy, Results. Located in Seattle, we are a full-service law firm committed to exceptional client service and professional excellence. Our firm serves individuals, professionals, entrepreneurs, educators, closely-held or family businesses, franchises, Fortune 500 corporations, and insurance companies.  They are in the private sector, public sector, and governments.  Our clients are forward thinkers, creative, collaborative, and deliver high-quality products and business services to their markets.  Their markets extend into almost every industry including, food and beverage, retail, professional services, arts, health care, education, manufacturing, technology, construction, real estate, and more.  We advocate for our clients.  We strategize with them to meet their goals.

By Joe Wallin

For more related articles about Founder Tax Issues, please visit our website, here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to me via email in the links above.

Federal Research Tax Credits for Startups

Guest Post By Dan Wright

Federal Research Tax Credits

Is your business involved in creating intellectual property or process and product improvement? If so, you or your business may qualify for federal research tax credits.

Common Misconceptions

First, let’s clear up some myths about what business activity qualifies for the credit. Many people think of white coats and test tubes when they hear the word “research.” However, in this context, the definition is much broader than that.

Another common misconception is that the research, or resulting products, must be completely original to qualify. However, that is not generally the case. Instead, qualifying research very often involves research that results in a product or process that is only new to the business performing the research. That fact that similar products or research may already exist is not relevant to qualifying your business activity.

What is the Credit Based On?

The credit is a wage-based program, which you can calculate by identifying the wages paid to employees who perform qualified research activities. Amounts paid to outside consultants are also included in the credit at 65% of each qualifying dollar spent. In some cases, supplies that are consumed in the research process can also be included in the calculation.

Multiple methods of calculating the credit may be available. But in short, the credit available to the qualifying business activity equates to 6%-20% percent of the incremental research expenses. The exact percentage is determined by the elected applicable method.

Who Qualifies for the Credit?

Any business performing qualifying research can qualify for the benefit. Since the incentive is in the form of a tax “credit,” the business must have a tax liability to get a current cash benefit. It is not a refundable credit, but the portion of a credit that is not used in the year it is generated can be carried forward.

Since regular corporations are subject to federal tax, they can claim the credit. Businesses that are considered “pass-through” entities for federal income tax purposes, such as LLCs that have elected partnership status and corporations (or LLCs) that have elected S corporation status, pass the credit through to the owners of the entity.

What Qualifies as Research Activity?

Only business activity conducted in the U.S. qualifies. Further, the research activity must be  “technological in nature.” This means that it must involve a hard science, such as computer software; engineering; medical, biological, or physical research; or other similar science disciplines.

Additionally, “funded research” does not typically qualify. This means that if research activity is funded by an outside source, such as grants or customers, the arrangement must be carefully evaluated to determine if it qualifies. That said, the fact that the research is partially or wholly funded by third parties does not automatically disqualify the activity.

What Activities do not Qualify?

The rules specify which business activities are disqualified. These activities include:

  • Costs incurred once production of the component begins;
  • Adaptation of an existing component to a particular customer’s requirement or need;
  • Efficiency surveys;
  • Activity related to management function/technique;
  • Marketing research;
  • Advertising or promotions;
  • Routine data collection/testing to evaluate quality control;
  • Activity related to style, taste, cosmetic or seasonal design factors.

New  Opportunities that Apply to 2016 and Beyond

Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) Offset

Until 2016, the credit could only be used to reduce a regular tax liability. Beginning in 2016, however, it can also be used to offset AMT liabilities. The AMT offset is only available to businesses with under $50 million in gross receipts. However, credits passing through from qualifying businesses can still apply to individual tax liabilities.

Payroll Tax Election

Beginning in 2016, qualified startup businesses can generate research credits. Qualified startup businesses include those that have not had “gross receipts” for more than 5 years (meaning, the five year test starts with the first year in which business had gross receipts), and have had gross receipts of less than $5 million in the claim year. Research credits can then be used to offset the employer’s portion of the FICA tax in the following year. It’s worth noting, however, that startups should consider the related party rules when applying the gross receipts tests.

Since many startup businesses don’t generate taxable income in the early years after formation, the credit program historically provided little, if any, immediate benefit. Now that the credit can be used to offset payroll taxes, the credit has real value for qualifying startups.

Questions?

If you would like help determining if your business activity qualifies for the research credit incentives, and/or determining an estimate of the benefit, please contact Dan Wright at dwright@clarknuber.com.